Net neutrality and the New World Order

Fellow Humans

The internet is the most modern of revolutions. Indeed it is the modern renaissance.Writng as we know it has only been practiced for about 5000 years. The printing press has only been around for a few hundred and the internet for a few decades.

From the humble beginnings of the first spoken words, human communication has been about social interaction. A need to transmit knowledge and to solve problems is the basis behind all communication throughout history.

The first written scripts were historical documents, detailing the life and times of our ancestors. Later we began to impart theories as our understanding grew. The advent of the printing press created the first opportunity for ideas to be transmitted with low overheads. This was a great tool and was quickly snapped up as a means of social control.

Communication fast became one way traffic as the newspapers of the day provided all the information required. People put their faith in the media and they became the “people’s watchdog”. Later, television increased the role and the public sucked up the information they were given. Today, the words of the media are by and large, trusted and taken as Gospel.

The Internet changed all that. It reopened the two way communication routes once again. Common people could enter the arguments of the day and impart their views across the world. They can make their own documentaries, books, videos and poetry.

They can also form groups and challenge the “official” line. About 90% of all internet content is attributed to input from private individuals.

The big media outlets want the monopoly back in their hands. They are pushing for regulation and restriction under the “net neutrality” argument. They wish to return to the one way communication that gave them huge profit and control. They are constructing an internet world where they will supply the services that you will pay for, much like the digital and satellite systems on the television.

Creators of the modern internet are outraged. The internet belongs to no man or company. The internet revolution, unless we take action, will be back in the hands of the corporations who had nothing to do with its creation, software, or content. All the phone companies do is carry the signals on the cable networks, which we pay for. Nothing else!

Internet 2 is on the cards. If you value your freedom of expression, choice and interaction, you must resist this. One way mass programming is a tool of the New World Order. They must not be allowed to retake this avenue of free speech and activity from us.

Your in Humanhood

Antireptilian

Media and the New World Order

Fellow Humans

We all use the media. Much like our school books, it is the area we gain the majority of our everyday knowledge. Throughout the day, we pick up newspapers, watch news broadcasts and listen to reports on the radio. Most of the time, when a point of interest reaches our ears, we repeat the story to our friends as if it is gospel. Seldom do we research the facts.

We put far too much faith in the media. It is one of the greatest influences on our daily lives, and has a massive impact on social control and programming. Very few people even know who funds and owns the source of their daily information injection.

To take an example, global warming.

The issue of climate change debate has been on the cards for over a century. Joseph Fourier first made the link between atmosphere and temperature in 1824 followed by Tyndall’s 1859 discovery that certain gasses block infrared radiation and that certain concentrations of these gasses could have an impact on climate.

The science and argument proceeded in the following years until 1988 when record drought and temperatures were covered in a massive media campaign that saw the formation of the IPCC and the Toronto conference that called for the first restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S administration, under pressure from the oil cartels, were lobbied to deny global warming and the signing of treaties like Kyoto that would dent their profits. The press stopped reporting.

Then, in 2004, out of the wild blue yonder, charges Club of Rome’s Al Gore with an “inconvenient truth” He is allocated prime spots in TV and newspaper slots and is hailed by the powers that be as the saviour. The Live Earth concerts are praised and advertised across the global media. None of the alternative theories for climate change were given any air time as the propaganda machine rolled forth. Dissent about the actualities of global warming was quashed under heel.

Even now, when the spectre of detrimental human contribution to world biological and climate is at its peak, we find the blame placed firmly at the door of the common man and his car. There is little mention of aircraft pollution (we are even seeing government promoted expansion of airports), packaging plastics, depleted uranium, GM crops and such like. Other instances of public manipulation are legion. Elections, globalism, terrorism, gun control, health.

Would live earth have been as successful without the massive media promotion?

Is the information required for good public debate being withheld?

Why was there a sudden media blitz on this subject when it had been downplayed in previous years?

Consider also that the much of the mainstream media is in the very few hands such as Vivendi, Universal, AOL Time Warner, Newscorp, Bertelsmann AG and Viacom. This is a dangerous situation where media has gone from public informer to public persuader. As Rupert Murdoch stated

“Our reach is unmatched around the world. We’re reaching people from the moment they wake up until they fall asleep. We give them their morning weather and traffic reports through our television outlets around the world. We enlighten and entertain them with such newspapers as The New York Post and The Times (of London) as they have breakfast, or take the train to work. We update their stock prices and give them the world’s biggest news stories every day through such news channels as Fox or Sky News … And when they get home in the evening we’re there to entertain them with compelling first-run entertainment on FOX or the day’s biggest game on our broadcast, satellite and cable networks. Before going to bed, we give them the latest news, and then they crawl into bed with one of our best-selling novels from HarperCollins.”
— Rupert Murdoch, News Corporation, 1999 Annual Report

Perhaps this will change your outlook on what you are told. Perhaps you will go on allowing the elites to dictate their agenda for you and your life. Perhaps you come to need your daily feed from the New World Order.

link http://www.mediachannel.org/ownership/granville.shtml

Your in Humanhood
Antireptilian