Net neutrality and the New World Order

Fellow Humans

The internet is the most modern of revolutions. Indeed it is the modern renaissance.Writng as we know it has only been practiced for about 5000 years. The printing press has only been around for a few hundred and the internet for a few decades.

From the humble beginnings of the first spoken words, human communication has been about social interaction. A need to transmit knowledge and to solve problems is the basis behind all communication throughout history.

The first written scripts were historical documents, detailing the life and times of our ancestors. Later we began to impart theories as our understanding grew. The advent of the printing press created the first opportunity for ideas to be transmitted with low overheads. This was a great tool and was quickly snapped up as a means of social control.

Communication fast became one way traffic as the newspapers of the day provided all the information required. People put their faith in the media and they became the “people’s watchdog”. Later, television increased the role and the public sucked up the information they were given. Today, the words of the media are by and large, trusted and taken as Gospel.

The Internet changed all that. It reopened the two way communication routes once again. Common people could enter the arguments of the day and impart their views across the world. They can make their own documentaries, books, videos and poetry.

They can also form groups and challenge the “official” line. About 90% of all internet content is attributed to input from private individuals.

The big media outlets want the monopoly back in their hands. They are pushing for regulation and restriction under the “net neutrality” argument. They wish to return to the one way communication that gave them huge profit and control. They are constructing an internet world where they will supply the services that you will pay for, much like the digital and satellite systems on the television.

Creators of the modern internet are outraged. The internet belongs to no man or company. The internet revolution, unless we take action, will be back in the hands of the corporations who had nothing to do with its creation, software, or content. All the phone companies do is carry the signals on the cable networks, which we pay for. Nothing else!

Internet 2 is on the cards. If you value your freedom of expression, choice and interaction, you must resist this. One way mass programming is a tool of the New World Order. They must not be allowed to retake this avenue of free speech and activity from us.

Your in Humanhood

Antireptilian

Children and the New World Order

Fellow Humans

Children are the future. They are born pure of mind, and throughout life, gain the attributes associated with their surroundings. The early years. or formative years, are crucial to the eventual outcome of the child’s personality and traits. It is believed that, even in the womb, children are shaped by the status of the mother and her surroundings.

So, what could be more important that ensuring the child grows in a healthy and loving environment. What could be more important than assuring the child is introduced to the wonders of the world and its knowledge, given the facts, allowing that child to forward man’s greatest journey with their imagination, creativity and the passion of youth.

That, I am afraid, is not what is happening. Instead, the parents spend the entire day at work, the child packed off to a state school, indoctrinated by a state program, returns home to find the parents exhausted, spends much of the few hours watching television, or alone behind a screen. The family structure has virtually been destroyed.

Many teachers inside the state school system are good souls with a real interest in the wellbeing of their charges. But they are tied into a system that strictly controls their activities, reduces their autonomy. In fact, I would say that teachers spend much of their time filling out performance management forms, evaluations, assessments, and individual education plans. They are the undervalued charges our most cherished concern.

It is crystal clear that social change agents are operating across the board, to shape and mould children into the human resources of the future. These change agencies operate at the behest of the New World Order gameplanners. The use of globalist, humanist and socialist material in the indoctrination process, coupled with pressures for the children to conform, are creating a herd like mentality, and an unquestioning attitude to information they are presented with. In short, the individuality of the child is under attack, and the colonisation of their minds by forces unseen is underway.

On top of this, Parents are being portrayed as dysfunctional and obstructive. Their role is being reduced to that of the baby factory. Indeed, new measures in the children Act, plan to put the surrogate social carer in place to accompany and mentor the child through the early years into their early adulthood.

A quote that puts all this into a perspective.

“One cannot permit submission to parental authority if one wishes to bring about profound social change….In order to effect rapid changes, any such centralised regime must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved. It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children to insulate the latter in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas. The desire may be to cause an even more total submission to the state, but if one wishes to mould children in order to achieve some future goal, one must begin to view them as superior, inasmuch as they are closer to this future goal. One must also study their needs with care in order to achieve this difficult preparation for the future. One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant.” Warren Bennis and Philip Slater The Temporary society 1968

If you love your children, you must look at the state education program. Talk to the children about some of these subjects and you may be surprised to hear the answers. Take a look at the content of exams. Examine the outcomes that are set, you will find the outcomes are the same, no matter which part of the land you reside. Take a look at the organisations and NGO’s getting involved in the education system. Demand a return to academia and the teaching of facts, not ideology, not policy, not the New World Order agenda

Yours in Humanhood
Antireptilian

Psychology and the the New World Order

Fellow Humans

Propaganda is an everyday tool used to manipulate people into a certain activity. It has been used to justify some of the most heinous of crimes and the redirection of thought for political and marketing needs. Human psychology is a factor we need, desperately, to understand if we are ever to throw off the yoke of tyranny and serfdom.

Erich Fromm wrote numerous works on the subject of human reaction to threat, and how our underlying mentality deals with it. When we examine the base reaction to threat, our “animal behaviour” bids us to do one of two things. Fight or flee. The primary difference between the animal and us is (as Fromm notes) mans ability of foresight. What this means is that an animal sees a threat as immediate in the present. We on the other hand have the ability to calculate a transgression by weighing up the odds. An example of this would be the nuclear build up during the cold war. We perceived, through information sources, that the Soviets wanted to dominate militarily, or even invade the west.. This in turn caused us to scale up our military machine. The Soviets did the same calculation and began to raise their own arsenals. The threat, one could argue, was perceived, and it represents one of histories finest examples of benign aggression.

Looking at this in the context of reaction to 911, we have part of the effected people displaying anger, another turning to authority for protection, and perhaps a bit of both in all of us. The perceived threat was generously advertised by the media, entrenching the feeling, and resulting in a wave of divisive hatred across the globe. I f we look at the attack on a different level, we could say that a gang of muggers lives in the northern part of our town. Would it be right, or prudent to destroy the northern part of town under the perception that everyone there is a mugger?

The same logic can be used on the terrorists themselves. The perception that the west would eventually destroy their particular system and beliefs created the same benign aggressive behaviour that led to the events that day.

We move on now to the narcissistic tendencies that are so common around us. The idea that only the things and values we feel are important to us as individuals are important or real, and that other realities are not worthy, is opportunistic ground for propaganda. Group narcissism, such as patriotism or religious fanaticism can be forged into a tool to press an agenda. As Fromm stated, “it is not easy for a nations leader to tell the people to kill or be killed because industry needs cheaper raw materials, cheaper labour, or new markets……. In addition, these predictions of threat from the outside are often self-fulfilling: the aggressor state, by preparing for war, forces the state that is about to be attacked to prepare also, thereby providing the “proof “of the alleged threat.”

Michael Tsarion speaks of the Jungian Animus figure in our societies. Animus, for me, represents the motivating force that leads to a particular action. It also represents hostility, and in the persona, the father figure. The Animus is found in many places in our society. Many leaders, religious figures movie personas. For instance, The evangelical priest like Jimmy Swaggert, Joseph Stalin and Sean Connery (as Arthur in First Knight)

We are all essentially children. We, in times of great distress or trial, feel the need to rely on our father figures to protect and guide us. Our lack of confidence and our lack of information mean that we feel we cannot possibly make the right choices when it matters. We therefore hand over responsibility to the Animus, we promise obedience, which is what the Animus requires of us, and hide behind his coat tails. At the same time, the “small fish” in the big sea of the state may have a chance to prove himself worthy to the Animus by acts of loyalty, even if it means actions that are deplorable.

To put all this in a nutshell then, Planes are flown into the twin towers, the propaganda machine rolls, Fear and anger rages, The Animus offers to defend and protect, the people offer obedience, The planners advance their program. This is called manipulation.

We all need to step back and look at the big picture. If you cannot see it, Ask someone who can. For the common man, our material, cultural and informational (not sure if that’s a word, but hey) poverty, prevents us taking our own decisions and directing our lives in what should be a free world. Self-determination is our dream. Ill leave you with one last quote from a man who clearly saw much of this big picture.

“If civilian life provided the elements of adventurousness, solidarity, equality, and idealism that can be found in war, it may be very difficult, we may conclude, to get people to fight a war. The problem for governments in war is to make use of this rebellion by harnessing it for the purpose of war; simultaneously it must be prevented from becoming a threat to the government by enforcing strict discipline and the spirit of obedience to the leaders who are depicted as the unselfish, wise, courageous men protecting their people from destruction. (Fromm, 1973: ).

Yours in Humanhood
Antireptilian